Orthodontics · Aligners
Clear aligners: what they do well and where they are weaker
Clear trays are comfortable and discreet, but they are not universal. This article sets out which tooth movements are achieved reliably, which remain difficult, and what happens once treatment ends.

The short answer
Clear aligners are a series of removable trays that move teeth gradually. A systematic review of 22 clinical studies found them viable for mild to moderate malocclusion in non-growing patients not requiring extractions, predictable for levelling, tipping and derotation except on canines and premolars, and of limited efficacy for bodily arch expansion and extraction space closure.
Key points
- A systematic review of 22 clinical studies found clear aligners viable for mild to moderate malocclusion in non-growing patients not requiring extractions.
- Movements with predictable outcomes are levelling, tipping and derotation, with the exception of canines and premolars.
- Efficacy is limited for bodily arch expansion, extraction space closure, correction of occlusal contacts and larger antero-posterior and vertical discrepancies.
- A review of 8 comparative studies reported treatment 6.31 months shorter than with fixed appliances, but weaker control of torque and of occlusal contacts.
- A Cochrane review of 47 randomised trials with 4,377 participants found low to very low certainty evidence and no firm conclusion that any retention approach is superior.
How invisible they really are
Clear trays are discreet, not invisible. At conversational distance they can be noticed, particularly in bright light. Most plans also involve small tooth-coloured composite shapes bonded to the teeth, called attachments, which give the tray purchase for a specific movement. They match the tooth shade but are still visible close up.
We use the popular phrase because that is how people search, but clear aligners is the more accurate term. The distinction is not pedantic: expecting total invisibility leads to disappointment in the first week.
How aligners work
Treatment starts with a scan and planning. A digital plan of the intended movements is produced, and a series of trays is manufactured from it. Each tray moves the teeth by a small increment and the next continues from there.
Trays are worn for almost the entire day and taken out only for eating and cleaning. This is the factor that rests entirely with you: a tray in its case moves nothing. If wear time falls short, the plan and reality diverge, and a new scan and a new series become necessary.
Some plans also involve interproximal reduction, minimal thinning of the enamel between teeth to create space. It is planned in advance and discussed rather than carried out by default.
What they do well
A systematic review of 22 clinical studies concluded that clear aligners are viable for mild to moderate malocclusion in non-growing patients not requiring extractions. The outcome is predictable for levelling, tipping and derotation, except on canines and premolars.
In practice that covers many common adult situations: mild crowding of the front teeth, small spaces, teeth that have drifted after previous orthodontic treatment, and alignment before aesthetic work.
A review of 8 comparative studies reported that aligner treatment was 6.31 months shorter (95% CI −8.37 to −4.24) than treatment with fixed appliances. That advantage applies to cases suitable for both methods, not to every case.
Where they are weaker, from the same evidence
The same review reports limited efficacy for bodily arch expansion, extraction space closure and correction of occlusal contacts, as well as for larger antero-posterior and vertical discrepancies.
The comparative review adds that aligners were less effective than fixed appliances at producing adequate occlusal contacts, at controlling torque, which is the inclination of the root, and at maintaining the result.
These limits do not make the method weak. They mean that choosing between aligners and a fixed appliance is a clinical decision rather than a preference. If a case falls outside the range, the honest answer is a referral, not a compromise on the result.
Retention and relapse: the part that matters most
Teeth do not stay in their new position by themselves. Active treatment is followed by retention with a retainer, whether bonded behind the teeth, removable, or a combination. That is part of the treatment, not an addition to it.
A Cochrane review of 47 randomised trials with 4,377 participants found that the evidence on retention methods is of low to very low certainty and does not support a conclusion that any one approach is superior.
Over long periods the data are sobering. In a study of 31 cases treated with four premolar extractions, mandibular anterior crowding continued to increase between ten and twenty years post-retention, and only 10% of cases had clinically acceptable mandibular alignment at twenty years, with no identifiable predictors of stability. That is why we discuss retention as a long-term commitment rather than a few months after treatment.
What has to be sound before starting
Moving teeth through inflamed gums makes the inflammation worse. Decay is treated first, gum inflammation is brought under control and a professional cleaning is carried out before treatment starts. Where bone has been lost around the teeth, the plan is adjusted to that limitation.
Aligners are not an aesthetic treatment in themselves, but they are often the first step towards one. Once teeth are aligned, a small correction with composite is sometimes enough instead of preparing teeth for veneers. That is the more conservative sequence where a case allows it.
Aligners have no published price, because the number of trays and the complexity differ. The quotation is issued in writing after examination and includes the retainer.
The Club awaits you
After an examination and scan you receive a plan with stages, timelines and a quotation that includes the retainer. Call +359 896 121 314 or visit us at 28 Dr Lyuben Popov Street, Briz, Varna.
What the evidence shows
−6.3
months shorter treatment with aligners than fixed braces
Systematic review of 8 comparative studies: weighted mean difference −6.31 months (95% CI −8.37 to −4.24). The same body of evidence shows aligners are less effective than fixed appliances at producing adequate occlusal contacts, controlling torque and maintaining the result. The evidence supports aligners for mild to moderate malocclusion without extractions.
Sources
Ke Y, Zhu Y, Zhu M. A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:24. (opens in a new window) · Rossini G, et al. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2015;85(5):881–889. (opens in a new window)
Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions
Almost the whole day. They are removed for eating, for hot or staining drinks and for cleaning the teeth. Your exact regimen is stated in your plan. Wear time is the factor with the strongest influence on the timeline: fewer hours per day means the movement falls behind what was planned.
Pressure and sensitivity in the first day or two after changing a tray are usual and then settle. If pain is severe, persistent, or clearly linked to one particular tooth, it should be checked at an appointment rather than waiting for the next tray in the series.
They can, if a retainer is not worn, and over the long term to some degree even with one. In a study of 31 extraction cases, lower front crowding kept increasing between ten and twenty years, and only 10% had clinically acceptable alignment at twenty years. This is why retention is treated as long term.
Yes, briefly. Removing them for an hour or two occasionally does not derail treatment, but regularly missing hours slows it down and can require a new series. If a period is coming up when you cannot wear them, say so in advance so that stage can be planned around it.
That is assessed with an examination, photographs, a scan and radiographic assessment, not from a description or a phone photograph. The examination shows whether the case falls within the range of the method. If it does not, we discuss the alternatives, including referral for a fixed appliance.
Related treatments
Clear aligners or fixed braces: what the evidence shows
The two approaches do not cover the same range of cases. This article reports the evidence in both directions: where aligners win, and where they remain weaker than fixed appliances.
Read moreHow long composite bonding lasts and what shortens its life
Composite bonding has no single expiry date. It lasts differently in different mouths and on different teeth. Here is what the studies report and which factors matter most.
Read moreClosing a gap between the front teeth with composite bonding
A gap between the front teeth can be closed in one visit with composite, or closed by moving the teeth themselves. The two routes give a different result and a different lifespan.
Read more

